Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit Chris from MN's column >>

CHRIS FROM MN

Home Page
One more voice in the internet wilderness
Articles Posted: 23  Links Seeded: 12
Member Since: 6/2008  Last Seen: 1/25/2010

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Star Trek: Why I Hated The Holodeck (An Über-Geek's Reverie)

Wed Aug 20, 2008 7:56 PM EDT
entertainment, tv, movies, science-fiction, sci-fi, star-trek, trek, picard, programmerdude, tng, holodeck, riker, dr-crusher, giordi
By Chris from MN

The infamous Yellow Grid

The Big Goodbye

11001001

Again!

Elementary, Dear Data

Elementary, Dear Data

Fistful Of Datas

A Matter Of Perspective

A Matter Of Perspective

Elementary, Dear Data

11001001

The Big Goodbye

The Big Goodbye

Fistful Of Datas

Ship In A Bottle

The Big Goodbye

Advertise | AdChoices

Don't get me wrong; I (still) love Star Trek! It occupies a big space in my heart and on my shelf. My contention is that the holodeck was a mistake. It's a fly in the ointment that made me say "blurg" instead of "wow". Here's the deal.

I lean towards benefit of the doubt when it comes to books and videos for entertainment. All I ask is that a story not make me mad. The problem with the holodeck was that it made me mad. It disrespected two of the few rules I have.

Two Things I think matter in Science Fiction
  1. I want the science to NOT be so preposterous it ruins the moment.
  2. I hold internal consistency in very high regard.

When it came to the holodeck, the science seemed silly, and it was logically loopy.1

Yeah, But!

The holodeck usually gave me a bad case of the "Yeah, buts!"

◈ The holodeck is said to use replicator and transporter technology. Yeah, but what about the sparkle effect? Transporters and Replicators sparkle and make noise when you use them. Holodeck: no noise, no sparkle. Also, Transporters and Replicators take a few seconds; they are not instantaneous.

◈ The holodeck can apparently simulate large virtual spaces, including the outdoors. Yeah, but what happens when people can see each other from a distance? If you can see each other, but you're pretty far apart, the other person should look small. What if someone is yelling at you from a four-story window or across a field?

◈ The holodeck can apparently simulate motion over a large virtual distance. Yeah, but what about inertia? If magic transporter effects move the scenery around you, your body has no velocity and no momentum. You can tell when you're moving if you speed up, slow down or change direction!

◈ Yeah, but how did it make Moriarty? Data is considered unique in the Trek Universe, in part because he is a machine intelligence. But apparently the holodeck's computer can make a pretty good one based on very simple specs.

Safeties Disabled!

The holodeck has a safety mechanism that prevents it from harming humans. Yeah, but it seems to break frequently, and it can be disengaged. There's very clever children on the Enterprise. You'd think the "holodeck safeties" would be at least as hard to disengage as, say, your cable box parental controls.

How can you build something that dangerous and not have a big, honking OFF switch?2

Why isn't there an OFF switch? Why is it so hard to shut down? It has to be getting power from somewhere; there must be circuit breakers somewhere. Otherwise, get a phaser; cut some power conduits!

Episodes

Matter Of Perspective3

This episode relies heavily on the holodeck and its magic powers. Commander Riker is accused of killing a scientist. Picard and company hold an investigation in a holodeck version of the scientist's lab.

It turns out that the holodeck representation of the scientist's machine is so accurate, it actually works! You have to wonder why anyone would bother to actually make anything if holo-technology works that well.

The story is hoist by its... well you know. Geordi tells us the machine needs coils made of a special material, which the scientist had ordered large quantities. (Seems like he would have been smarter to just use a holodeck–no backordering.) In the end, the holodeck version works so well it explodes–just as the real one did at the start of the episode.

The first explosion destroyed a space station and killed the scientist. The holo-explosion of the machine in the holodeck.....does nothing. Only Picard and company remain, sitting in their chairs in the familiar yellow-grid of the idle holodeck. (Presumably they were holo-chairs and a holo-desk; why bring in real furniture!)

On the one hand, things in the holodeck are as solid and lifelike as the items on the bridge. You can sit on the chairs and climb the trees. But on the other hand, they can vanish harmlessly in a nano-jiffy. Transporter/Replicator technology sparkles, makes noise and isn't instantaneous. It can't be both ways.

Elementary, Dear Data4
Ship In A Bottle5

In the season two episode, Geordi tells the holodeck to create an "adversary capable of defeating Data." The computer creates Sherlock Holms' nemesis, Moriarty. Pretty amazing trick for the computer; all it took was a single command from Geordi.

I guess you had to get the wording just exactly right.

In the much later one, Moriarty returns to plague the Enterprise. Lesson to be learned: be really, really careful what you ask the computer to do. It might create a virtual enemy that can beat you!

If Moriarty is considered an intelligent life form with whom Picard negotiates, what does that suggest about his giving orders to the Enterprise computer? After all, the computer created Moriarty; what does that make the computer?

110010016

Picard and Riker and Minuet. Another amazingly lifelike simulation.

The Big Goodbye7

A one-in-a-million freak event causes the holodeck safeties fail and endanger Picard, et alii.

A Dixon Hill story. My question about bullets is: does the holodeck simulate the gunpowder exploding? Holo-chairs are real, you can sit on them; what about a holo-gun, how real is it?

Fistful Of Datas8

A one-in-a-million freak event causes the holodeck safeties fail and endanger Worf, et alii.

Some think a Western episode indicates the death knell of a show with spaceships. ((Firefly was a Western with spaceships—totally different concept.)) How about a Western in the holodeck? Combine that with a holodeck malfunction, and you gots yer se'f a rip-rootin' ol' time!

If Only...

I can think of many good stories that could take place on a "real" holodeck. By "real" I mean a holodeck that doesn't rely on magic transporter-replicator technology. All we need to assume is advanced 3D photo and display capabilities. Would you trade any of the episodes above for:

◈ Suppose they displayed an image of every solar system they visited (as they entered the system), and a view of any planet they orbited. This could have been a semi-regular feature, like 10-Forward; a background for scenes. Imagine Bev and Troi apparently walking around, in space, in orbit, around this week's planet!

◈ Mount a holo-camera on a probe, and fire it off into something interesting. The visuals could be very creative. The holodeck is an "effect" in real life, so it can look like an effect.

◈ There was an episode where Geordi used the holodeck to save the Enterprise and fell in love with the holo-image of a scientist. I would have liked to see Geordi walking around inside the engines! Wouldn't you have liked to see that?

◈ We have CAT-scan machines now that generate 3D images of the inside of your body. Imagine if Doctor Crusher walking around inside a patient's body before surgery! What if it had been a really weird alien!

◈ In one episode, a hull-eating space virus infected the Enterprise? Imagine Picard and Geordi taking a walk around the Enterprise. Imagine the two of them standing on nothing beneath the gentle curve of the saucer!

I can see so many ways to add fiction to the science without completely compromising the science. I've always believed Science Fiction can be both popular and critically robust. I believe that Science Fiction, in particular, can sometimes even be educational!

Footnotes

[1] It's going to be difficult to avoid using the obvious pun, "Hoist by their own Picard."
 
[2] Sometimes I wonder why Picard didn't just weld shut the doors.
 
[3] Season 3. A Matter Of Perspective
 
[4] Season 2. Elementary, Dear Data
 
[5] Season 6. Ship In A Bottle
 
[6] Season 1. 11001001
 
[7] Season 1. The Big Goodbye
 
[8] Season 6. Fistful Of Datas
 

© 2008 Chris from MN; screensnaps & captioning © Paramount Star Trek:TNG™

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Chris from MN's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: Absolutely NO Politics, Entertainment Gateway, Movies, Etc., Newsviners' Picks, Science Fiction, Star Trek, The Drollhouse
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (64)
Chris from MN

This is a highly updated version of an article I published long, long ago in a network far, far away.

I wrote it back when TNG was still on the air, but did Paramount listen? No, they did not. :-)

But people have smiled at it over the years, so I thought it would be fun to give it a second life. Please keep in mind, this was written with tongue firmly inserted into cheek. Don't take it too seriously!

  • 9 votes
Reply#1 - Wed Aug 20, 2008 8:00 PM EDT
M. Remmers

Let's not forget the worst Holodeck episode of all, "Emergence." That's the one where the Enterprise itself develops some sort of sentience for no reason at all and tries to asexually reproduce in the Holodeck. It's achieved by the Orient Express appearing out of nowhere to deliver a bunch of random stereotypes to "New Vertiform City" so they can stick bricks in a wall, causing the ship to birth a terrible bit of CGI that looks like a cross between an Everlasting Gobstopper and the "3D Pipes" ScreenSaver. Ugh. So, so, awful. I'd endure an entire "The Boy" marathon before suffering through that crap again.

  • 8 votes
#1.1 - Thu Aug 21, 2008 8:31 AM EDT
Chris from MN

Yes... some things are best fogotten! :-)

  • 6 votes
#1.2 - Thu Aug 21, 2008 1:39 PM EDT
MarkD-555

Thank you. Transporter "Accidents" were bad enough in the original series. Holodeck theater "incidents" are worse.

Just letting the writers do what ever the hell they felt like with that kind of reverse Deus ex machina usually made for bad episodes. Create anything you want to cause a problem. If you feel like writing some crap film noir detective story, stop writing for Star Trek.

We need more "low-tech" sci-fi.

  • 1 vote
#1.3 - Fri Jun 10, 2011 6:18 PM EDT
Reply
Brad Leclerc

I feel your pain. The Holodeck was the biggest problem I had with Star Trek (any of them).

I hold internal consistency in very high regard.

Couldn't agree more. I can accept even the most non-sensical silliness so long as it's non-sensical in a consistent way. If a movie says that animals can talk, and they are consistent about it...that's fine by me. If a movie says that Santa is real, and parents still don't believe their children when they say they've seen him, there's a serious problem (a lot of problems really....which is way most Santa movies piss me off to no end...but that's another story....)

  • 7 votes
Reply#2 - Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:11 PM EDT
Chris from MN

Ho! Ho! Ho!

The hardest part was not going into too much detail, which is all too easy to do when you start really looking at the holodeck. There were a lot of other examples I could have gotten into.

And, seeing how the pix run below the article, I guess I could write a bit more. I actually deleted four pix before posting the article. There's still too many for the text, but I just don't have the heart to axe any of the ones remaining.

  • 6 votes
#2.1 - Wed Aug 20, 2008 11:30 PM EDT
Reply
jsweck

I'm in full agreement about the holodeck. Ever since I saw Wes hitting Picard with the holo snowball that acted an awful lot like a real one in the corridor, I had the sense that this wasn't a well thought out technology. I assume that the story writers and actors loved it. Have you ever wondered about the holo-schedule you would need to allow 1200 people access? Did you notice how Riker+company was able to march into the holodeck without any kind of privacy to catch Barclay in the act? Also, the force-field generated by Barclay when he was intellectually advanced should not have been possible due to holo-safties. You're right, they never work.

Since they had mind scan technology they should have had virtual reality technolgy. The holodeck story elements could have been executed better that way.

  • 7 votes
Reply#3 - Thu Aug 21, 2008 12:46 AM EDT
Chris from MN

Have you ever wondered about the holo-schedule you would need to allow 1200 people access?

Ha! That's a good one. No, it never occurred to me. (I seem to recall a mention that there were four holodecks? Even so, that's a pretty scarce resource!)

Did you notice how Riker+company was able to march into the holodeck without any kind of privacy to catch Barclay in the act?

That doesn't surprise me too much. Riker is a ranking officer who may well have special access.

  • 6 votes
#3.1 - Thu Aug 21, 2008 1:46 PM EDT
jsweck

Riker may have rank but the holodeck would frequently be used for private sexual fantasies, and other entertainment. It would not be surprising if there was some official or unofficial rule about barging in.

  • 4 votes
#3.2 - Thu Aug 21, 2008 11:51 PM EDT
Reply
Thura

I thought the Holodeck was a cool idea - I mean it. That was until a few writers got lazy and started writing multiple stories about it. If any concept/idea was milked dry in TNG, it was the Holodeck.

  • 7 votes
Reply#4 - Thu Aug 21, 2008 4:00 AM EDT
Division by Zero

Agreed. The holodeck was a nifty piece of work, aside from the obvious problems that Chris pointed out, but the writers began to rely on it far too much. As a plot device it allowed them to have a story (or a story within a story) that could break the rules. It was fiction within fiction that could allow for the exploration of a character without having to create a situation in the "real" world to allow for that exploration. It was used far too frequently though and never explored the most interesting storyline, holodeck hookers. <grin>

  • 8 votes
#4.1 - Thu Aug 21, 2008 12:40 PM EDT
patriciaad

Division! Ewww.

  • 5 votes
#4.2 - Thu Aug 21, 2008 1:50 PM EDT
Chris from MN

Well, there was Riker and Minuet.... I'm sure there are "standards" on a Federation Starship.

Part 12, Section 28, Rule 9: No Holo-Hookers! Ever.

(Barclay was having some fun with Crusher and Troi that one time. :-)

((And Quark sure hinted about certain types of holo-programs! :-))

  • 6 votes
#4.3 - Thu Aug 21, 2008 1:51 PM EDT
Chris from MN

If any concept/idea was milked dry in TNG, it was the Holodeck.

Indeed. It just made things too easy. It was too permissive.

  • 5 votes
#4.4 - Thu Aug 21, 2008 1:53 PM EDT
Thura

((And Quark sure hinted about certain types of holo-programs! :-))

That darn Farengi, always hinting at stuff but never delivering :-)

  • 5 votes
#4.5 - Thu Aug 21, 2008 3:31 PM EDT
M. Remmers

Barclay was having some fun with Crusher and Troi that one time.

Yeah. "Hollow Pursuits" is the only episode that even remotely touches on the sort of perversions the Holodecks would most certainly be used for. You'd want to air that thing out for an hour or two after I've been in there...

  • 7 votes
#4.6 - Thu Aug 21, 2008 4:23 PM EDT
Chris from MN

That darn Farengi, always hinting at stuff but never delivering

I did finally break down and buy the whole DS9 series. I'd stopped watching the show somewhere around season four. I was glad I did. I never knew about Worf and Jadzia! Or what happened after she ... you know (don't want to spoil it just in case).

Worf & Troi... Worf & Jadzia... That Klingon got around!

Anyway, I have decided I really like Quark. Shimerman did a brilliant job of redeeming the Ferengi as a species (don't forget, he was one of those first three we saw in The Last Outpost).

Quark & Vash... Quark & Grilka... (Quark & Natima Lang...) That Ferengi got around!

Anyway, my pointis it would be a blast hanging out at Quark's Bar drinking with Norm Morn.

  • 4 votes
#4.7 - Thu Aug 21, 2008 4:41 PM EDT
Division by Zero

I finally got caught up on DS9 about 8 months or so ago. The only station that carried it locally abruptly stopped carrying it after the 2nd season so I had missed out on almost every episode of the remaining 5 seasons except for the random shows that I managed to catch either at my sister-in-law's house or while spending a night in a hotel.

  • 5 votes
#4.8 - Thu Aug 21, 2008 5:03 PM EDT
patriciaad

DS9 was my least favorite series. The Farengi(I have no idea how to spell that) were the only saving grace for me.

The shape-shifter character was so droll and unlikeable, I just couldn't stand him.

  • 5 votes
#4.9 - Thu Aug 21, 2008 5:12 PM EDT
Chris from MN

Well, I problems with shape shifters in general.

If Odo can become a glass on Quark's tray in order to get into a room to monitor a meeting, where does his weight go? Quark seems to notice nothing unusual about the weight of the glass.

And when Odo is an object, such as a glass, what does he see and hear with?

  • 6 votes
#4.10 - Thu Aug 21, 2008 7:20 PM EDT
Thura

The Odo, Quark relationship is a weird one of mutual-dependency. I mean If Odo was this hotshot security that could be anything to spy on Quark, why wasn't he able to put Quark away for good (as he always threatens to do so - but never really succeeds).

My theory is that Odo is getting some shape-shifting action in one of Quarks holosuites, so he keeps up appearance of harassing Quark in public, and Quark like the good Ferengi he is plays along. I am sure that there is a Rules of Acquisition that applies to the perverted relationship between the two.

:-o did I just write that, my inner geek is coming out!!

  • 7 votes
#4.11 - Thu Aug 21, 2008 11:00 PM EDT
Chris from MN

That's pretty good, I like that! Their relationship was certainly an odd couple one!

  • 5 votes
#4.12 - Thu Aug 21, 2008 11:21 PM EDT
Kearney Outlaw

And when Odo is an object, such as a glass, what does he see and hear with?

Duh. A glass eye. ;-)

  • 3 votes
#4.13 - Thu Jun 9, 2011 6:54 PM EDT
Reply
M. Remmers

It's a good thing that there aren't any lawyers in the future since these things malfunction every other damn time you step into them. The Federation would get bankrupted with all the gold-pressed latinum they'd be coughing up in settlements.

  • 8 votes
Reply#5 - Thu Aug 21, 2008 7:55 AM EDT
Chris from MN

Maybe in the future they followed Shakespeare's infamous advice about lawyers! :-)

Or maybe we finally learn the trick of personal responsibility and drop the tendency to be so litigious.

  • 4 votes
#5.1 - Thu Aug 21, 2008 1:56 PM EDT
Reply
patriciaad

Yeah, but what happens when people can see each other from a distance? If you can see each other, but you're pretty far apart, the other person should look small. What if someone is yelling at you from a four-story window or across a field?

Why couldn't the holodeck accommodate this by distorting the other person's image - to make them appear far away?

what about inertia? If magic transporter effects move the scenery around you, your body has no velocity and no momentum. You can tell when you're moving if you speed up, slow down or change direction!

Why couldn't the holodeck simulate this sensation?

It turns out that the holodeck representation of the scientist's machine is so accurate, it actually works! You have to wonder why anyone would bother to actually make anything if holo-technology works that well.

Excellent point.

  • 5 votes
Reply#6 - Thu Aug 21, 2008 1:48 PM EDT
Chris from MN

Why couldn't the holodeck accommodate this by distorting the other person's image - to make them appear far away?

Crafty idea, but about the only thing it could do would be to create a lensing effect of some kind, and you'd think that would be distorting enough to be noticable. It could making trying to toss a ball to someone rather interesting!

Why couldn't the holodeck simulate this sensation?

Good question, I don't know. I guess it would depend on what physiological factors cause the feelings of inertia. When you're on a bike, and you turn, your body wants to keep moving in the direction it was moving, so you "lean into the turn" to counteract that.

Well, I suppose if it can create a living, breathing, kissable woman.... [shrug]

  • 7 votes
#6.1 - Thu Aug 21, 2008 2:01 PM EDT
M. Remmers

Crafty idea, but about the only thing it could do would be to create a lensing effect of some kind...

If memory serves, this is actually covered in the Star Trek The Next Generation Technical Manual and that's precisely how it works. That's a good read, too, if you've got a dominant geek gene which -- let's face it -- everybody in this thread has.

  • 6 votes
#6.2 - Thu Aug 21, 2008 4:43 PM EDT
patriciaad

That's a good read, too, if you've got a dominant geek gene which -- let's face it -- everybody in this thread has.

I dunno... I draw the line at reading Star Trek Technical Manuals. Perhaps I don't really fit in here.

  • 6 votes
#6.3 - Thu Aug 21, 2008 4:50 PM EDT
M. Remmers

Aw, c'mon! You're really trying to tell me that an in-depth analysis on the hydrogen-collecting properties of the Bussard ramjet doesn't get you all hot? Methinks thou doth protest too much.

  • 6 votes
#6.4 - Thu Aug 21, 2008 5:07 PM EDT
patriciaad

Nope - but I do think it's cute when guys like to read them. That's why I love the movie Galaxy Quest. The Trekkie-ish character Brandon cracked me up.

  • 6 votes
#6.5 - Thu Aug 21, 2008 5:16 PM EDT
M. Remmers

To each his-or-her own, I suppose. But that book is really a testament to the obscene amount of effort that went into creating one make-believe spaceship. When you stumble upon something like the exorbitant detailing of algebraic equations and applied physics that govern the consumption of a fuel that doesn't @!$%#ing exist... you can't help but be awed by it. On second thought, I guess this book is really more an examination of the fine line between "nerd" and "neurological disorder".

  • 7 votes
#6.6 - Thu Aug 21, 2008 5:57 PM EDT
Chris from MN

It would be more admirable if it had all been done up front rather than after the fact.

Michael Okuda is a name behind a lot of Trek effects and a lot of those Trek books. He's famous for designing that curvy display system (LCARS) used in nearly all the trek displays. There's one visible in the picture above with Barclay (second from the last).

The books are fun, but I think they blew it with the transporters and replicators (that's an article I'm working on :-), and obviously I think they blew it with the holodeck.

I'll probably write this into a longer article sometime, but in my crowd (and now this crowd) I've coined the term, "Star Trekking it" to describe the mental gymnastics of trying to retrofit an "explanation" onto some movie or tv show device.

  • 6 votes
#6.7 - Thu Aug 21, 2008 7:30 PM EDT
Reply
Carloz

I usually liked the Holodek episodes, depending on the particular story, of course. I thought it allowed for some real creativity and breakouts in stories and could involve history, literature, fantasy, etc.

The time travel stories sometimes bothered me a little, but I often ended up enjoying them, too. (I'm such an unabashed fan of all Star Treks that maybe I'm not critical enough.)

On Star Trek Voyager Capitan Janeway often made some amusing comments during time travel episodes, sort of as a wink to the audience.

Anyway, thanks again and keep up the interesting writing.

  • 7 votes
#7 - Fri Aug 22, 2008 7:30 AM EDT
Chris from MN

Thanks for your comment!

You're right, time travel stories are problematic, because time travel is inherently contradictory. (But I'm afraid I was never a Voyager fan, so I missed Janway's comments.)

Did you see the A&E re-make of Andromea Strain? It's currently at the top of my list of worst time travel story I can think of.

  • 6 votes
#7.1 - Fri Aug 22, 2008 12:35 PM EDT
Carloz

Yes, I did see the new Andromeda Strain. I found it pretty forgettable.

It seems that a lot of people didn't care for Voyager, but out of all the STs, it's my favorite. I own the entire series and every year or so watch most of the episodes again.

Next in my line up would be Deep Space 9, then Next Generation, then Enterprise.

What a disappointment Enterprise was to me -- everything from that awful pop theme song to Scott Bakula, who to me made a terrible Captain Jonathan Archer! But as I said, I am such an unabashed fan, overall I enjoyed watching the series. I thought Jolene Blalock was the best thing about that series. I liked John Billingsley, too. What did you think of the series?

I'm looking forward to the new movie and hope it's good. Even if it isn't, I'll probably enjoy watching it. :-)

  • 6 votes
#7.2 - Fri Aug 22, 2008 4:25 PM EDT
patriciaad

It seems that a lot of people didn't care for Voyager, but out of all the STs, it's my favorite.

I enjoyed it the most, too.

Yeah, Enterprise just kind of petered out for me and I only watched the first season and perhaps part of the next. I enjoyed the female vulcan character. There were a couple of great episodes...

  • 6 votes
#7.3 - Fri Aug 22, 2008 4:45 PM EDT
Division by Zero

I found that Enterprise actually improved significantly prior to being canceled. It was as if the writers had finally found their groove and were creating good stories then the show got canned. The first 3 seasons floundered but then the ship started slowly turning and it became worthwhile to tune in. Unfortunately, by that point viewers had tuned out. I really think that the fans who insisted on absolute continuity with the established Trek storyline really did Enterprise a disservice. As has famously been said, "It's just a show!" and if the writers wanted to violate canon and could do so in a logical way, I wasn't bothered. Let's face it, the original show went on the air in 1966 and even the novels and movies revised canon.

  • 6 votes
#7.4 - Fri Aug 22, 2008 5:15 PM EDT
patriciaad

I found that Enterprise actually improved significantly prior to being canceled. It was as if the writers had finally found their groove and were creating good stories then the show got canned.

Too bad, I guess I should have hung in there...

  • 5 votes
#7.5 - Fri Aug 22, 2008 5:29 PM EDT
Chris from MN

It seems that a lot of people didn't care for Voyager

No, and I would have be numbered among them.

Didn't buy Mrs Columbo as the captain of a starship, didn't really care for any of the characters and I really hated Neelix. I found the holo-doctor fun... for about five minutes and then he was just annoying. (I did get a kick out of how they used him in the movie, First Contact.)

Please keep in mind, these are all "matter of taste" issues, not critical judgements. Some people like Rocky Road ice cream. I won't touch it, and it's just a matter of taste.

However, since the main topic is holo-nonsense, speaking of the holo-doctor, there was at least one time he was "sick" and everyone was wringing their hands, "What do we do!"

Um,... re-boot the sucker? Are you honestly telling me you don't have a clean backup copy or the original 250-CD set? :-)

  • 6 votes
#7.6 - Fri Aug 22, 2008 5:46 PM EDT
Chris from MN

I liked Enterprise okay, but it wasn't perfect. I stopped watching it in real time more due to scheduling conflicts than anything else. I bought the seasons on DVD and was glad I did. Watched as a full piece, it works pretty well.

But that theme song.... ugh, yuck, blech.

I'd rank the TV series as: TOS, TNG, ENT, DS9, TAS... and that other one. :-)

(Please don't take me too seriously on Voyager. It's just a show I love to hate.)

Very much agree that the last eps of Enterprise were choice! There was a two part story, In a Mirror, Darkly that takes place in the mirror universe from the TOS episode, Mirror, Mirror. They even re-did the theme song; instead of new agey discovery, it was about martial conquest. :-)

DS9 also had a few eps concerning that mirror universe, and I always rather liked the "bad" Kira Nerys! (I've always had a taste for edgy women. :-)

  • 5 votes
#7.7 - Fri Aug 22, 2008 6:00 PM EDT
Thura

It seems that a lot of people didn't care for Voyager, but out of all the STs, it's my favorite.

Finally, a few non-haters. While it is not my favorite, I liked it.

  • 5 votes
#7.8 - Sat Aug 23, 2008 5:32 AM EDT
Carloz

Chris, I actually laughed when I read, "and that other one." So, no offense taken.

I, too, thought Enterprise got better as it went on. Maybe if they'd killed off Archer, or transferred him somewhere, I would have liked it even more.

Regarding Voyager's Doctor getting sick, the idea was that they couldn't simply re-boot him because in order to "clean his system out," so to speak, he would have to lose memories and the personality he had developed. I forgot to mention earlier that I loved his character. As we'd say in Spanish he was a "cabrón encantador." (A lovable old goat.)

And, by the way, Janeway has been my favorite ST captain so far and wish they'd include her in an upcoming movie. Different strokes for different folks. :-)

Let's hope a new series is introduced one day, with new characters to love, hate and everything in between.

  • 5 votes
#7.9 - Sat Aug 23, 2008 7:46 AM EDT
Carloz

Ahh, one thing I did not like on Voyager was when they replaced Kes with 7of9. I liked the addition of 7of9, but didn't see why they had to remove Kes. And the episode where Kes returned was not a very good episode.

I guess I've strayed a bit from the Holodek theme. Sorry.

  • 5 votes
#7.10 - Sat Aug 23, 2008 8:51 AM EDT
patriciaad

I forgot to mention earlier that I loved his character. As we'd say in Spanish he was a "cabrón encantador." (A lovable old goat.)

I loved the doctor, too. He was quite rude at the beginning, but his personality grew and he became loveable. His interactions with 7of9 were interesting, too. I remember when they sang the "You are my Sunshine" duet.

Also, the them song to Voyager is my favorite theme song form the ST's.

  • 5 votes
#7.11 - Sat Aug 23, 2008 9:01 AM EDT
Chris from MN

And, by the way, Janeway has been my favorite ST captain so far and wish they'd include her in an upcoming movie. Different strokes for different folks. :-)

Definitely, Amigo!

Meeting people who are Yin to our Yang is one of the best possible reminders of what it means to be a member of the human race. For every taste, there is a counter-taste!

In the spirit of fun,... Yeah, but, don't they back up his current state (hopefully) pretty regularly? People who are serious about software and data do that now, so wouldn't that be more the case on a Federation Starship? Why can't you just reload his last clean backup? :-)

  • 4 votes
#7.12 - Sat Aug 23, 2008 8:02 PM EDT
Carloz

Yeah, but, if they had done that, then it would have been too easy and less dramatic!

I did often have questions in my mind about the Holo-Emitter that allowed the doctor to leave sick bay. (Which, by the way, was a device they found during one of those time travel episodes).

They didn't seem to be able to duplicate it, so there was only one he could use, which caused the doctor (and me!) to panic whenever it was damaged, taken away, etc.

They could practically re-build the whole Voyager while being lost in space (and did!), but they couldn't duplicate (nor even "replicate") that little device.

The poor doctor.

I guess it would of been another case of too easy and less dramatic.

patriciaad, I, too, enjoyed his interaction with 7of9. And the episodes with him singing were some of the best!

  • 6 votes
#7.13 - Sun Aug 24, 2008 7:03 AM EDT
patriciaad

Ahhhh. A kindred spirit.

  • 4 votes
#7.14 - Sun Aug 24, 2008 9:11 AM EDT
StevG-144

I like Carloz was just a fan of, all the Star Trek's and tended to accept "as is" all the episodes, because it was still better then anything else on. Deep space nine was the least of my favorites, and only watched occasional, but still find the shows on and watch them when I can.

  • 2 votes
#7.15 - Wed Jun 8, 2011 10:59 AM EDT
Reply
brinsmaid

While I commend you on your thoughtful analysis, I find that, at the same time, your analysis is the issue here. Simply put, you just need to suspend reality for an hour an enjoy the show.

The Holodeck was a plot device created for the purpose of expanding Star Trek's reach and entertainment value to a larger audicence, one that goes eyond Sci-fi fans.

  • 5 votes
Reply#8 - Fri Aug 22, 2008 12:12 PM EDT
Chris from MN

Thank you, and thanks for commenting!

I understand your point. With the transporters, which Roddenberry created expressly for the purpose of moving the story along, I can suspend my disbelief okay. But the entire point of my essay is that–to me–the holodeck was done so poorly that it broke my suspension. It was fantasy in a show that was explicitly not fantasy. It gave me a bad case of the "Yeah, but"s.

Naturally we all bring our own thoughts and perceptions as audience. If you had no problems with the holodeck, then you were more fortunate with it than I! :-)

  • 6 votes
#8.1 - Fri Aug 22, 2008 12:43 PM EDT
brinsmaid

Actually, I didn't like most Holodeck episodes. I think TNG and Voyager relied on the Holodeck too much as a plot device. To some degree it became a crutch for the writers.

(Thanks for not misinterpreting my earlier reply. It wasn't meant to sound argumentative, but seems to sound that way.)

  • 5 votes
#8.2 - Fri Aug 22, 2008 1:05 PM EDT
Chris from MN

No problem! Genuine participation of any kind is completely welcome.

(I love a good debate, but I'm not spoiling for a fight!)

  • 4 votes
#8.3 - Fri Aug 22, 2008 1:49 PM EDT
Reply
Lilithbytes

The non sentience of the Holodeck characters is a peeve. The hammy acting (intentional) that they never strive to overcome their programming. It means we perceive an overwhelming simplicity, since we sense the characters do not suffer from the 'human condition'.

I enjoy reading about sci-fi, thanks Chris from MN.

  • 5 votes
Reply#9 - Mon Sep 8, 2008 6:50 PM EDT
Chris from MN

Me, too! Thank you, and thanks for dropping by.

Your comment made me think of two things:

We're discovering how fairly simple programming and sensory equipment can result is surprisingly life-like behaviors, which makes one wonder a little about our own "programming".

There's a fairly recent cosmology theory that speculates that all of reality might be a holographic projection of some sort. Perhaps Old Bill got it right, we are actors on our own holodeck!

Okay, three things:

In 11001001, Riker returns to the holodeck after the Binars have left and removed their "magic" programming. Riker hopes to resume with Minuet, of course, but he finds exactly the lifeless automaton you describe.

  • 4 votes
#9.1 - Mon Sep 8, 2008 7:04 PM EDT
Lilithbytes

There's a fairly recent cosmology theory that speculates that all of reality might be a holographic projection of some sort. Perhaps Old Bill got it right, we are actors on our own holodeck!

I'm a fan of involution, there are a number of things which could be, but our human experience still designates how that would be perceived.

In 11001001, Riker returns to the holodeck after the Binars have left and removed their "magic" programming. Riker hopes to resume with Minuet, of course, but he finds exactly the lifeless automaton you describe.

Yes, he had sobered up. The magic was gone.

  • 5 votes
#9.2 - Mon Sep 8, 2008 7:19 PM EDT
Chris from MN

I'm a fan of involution, there are a number of things which could be, but our human experience still designates how that would be perceived.

I keep a hope we can transcend that through some form of letting go. I've been trying to actively connect with quantum reality for a couple years (with zero evident success). There seems to be such a strong link with....

Actually, this conversation would be more appropriate under one of your articles. See you there...

  • 3 votes
#9.3 - Mon Sep 8, 2008 7:26 PM EDT
Reply
McSpocky

Wow, great article. I'm impressed!

  • 5 votes
Reply#10 - Wed Jun 8, 2011 10:34 AM EDT
Tedd Riggs

me too, How did I miss this one ?

  • 4 votes
Reply#11 - Wed Jun 8, 2011 4:05 PM EDT
Division by Zero

Well, back in the day, there were great articles written for Newsvine that had absolutely nothing to do with politics, articles that even made it into the Newsvine Columnists section. Sadly, those days are gone.

  • 3 votes
Reply#12 - Wed Jun 8, 2011 9:08 PM EDT
Cooper1

Too true, d/0. Today, if it's not politics or religion, you might as well not even post it. Not like anybody is going to read it. At least, that's the way it seems to me.

Don't get me wrong, I know there's still a few of us out there that don't care about the politics, but that's all most are after anymore.

  • 2 votes
#12.1 - Thu Jun 9, 2011 9:23 AM EDT
Reply
joeiraqi

I wish I would have seen this first time around. Good article.

One item that helps me with the Holodeck is the use of tractor/repulsor fields. They could cause physical sensations without objects actually being present. Additionally, we don't know all the upgrades the holodeck received over the course of the series. Maybe they are in a virtual reality bubble where images are broadcast to their eyes and senses manipulated via tractor/repulsor fields so they actually move very little. This doesn't cover all the manufacturing and sentient being issues, but I think it does make the technology a tiny bit more plausible.

  • 2 votes
Reply#13 - Thu Jun 9, 2011 8:54 AM EDT
chasencash

I liked the holodeck as an extension of virtual worlds. If you think about gamers and people who actually spend enormous amounts of time building up alternative cyber realities not only in games but in virtual worlds I think the holodeck is an inspired vision. Ws it successfully transported to the screen.

If you can envision a machine that produces food and earl grey tea and your matter being transported from one place to another...you cannot envision a virtual reality with all the bells and whistles of sensory knowledge taken care of?

The only annoying thing to me was holodeck personalities coming out of that world into reality.

I loved the matrix also. Well the first one more than the others.

  • 2 votes
Reply#14 - Thu Jun 9, 2011 5:50 PM EDT
Kearney Outlaw

Excellent article, Chris. I saw early on that the Holodeck was going to be a problem. When the technology was associated with replicator and transporter technology (and all the details we learned about them) I wondered how long it would be before someone cottoned on to replicating people. Backups. We saw a little of that thought in later episodes, but right from the start it was just too powerful and not well thought-out.

I look forward to more from you! (I presume you own some copy of the Nitpicker's Guide?)

  • 3 votes
Reply#15 - Thu Jun 9, 2011 7:05 PM EDT
Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
(XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
Newsvine Privacy Statement
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
FUN STUFF:
  • Leaderboard |
  • E-Mail Alerts |
  • Top of the Vine |
  • Newsvine Live |
  • Newsvine Archives |
  • The Greenhouse |
COMPANY STUFF:
  • Code of Honor |
  • Company Info |
  • Contact Us |
  • Jobs |
  • User Agreement |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • About our ads
LEGAL STUFF:
  • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com